All data analysis performed on SPSS, a joint venture partner with Luftig & Warren International.
| This is what you would get if you analyzed the production data properly using a full factorial regression model. It says that there is a statistically significant interaction between the two factors which accounts for an important amount of the variability seen in the data. This will give you the right answer, although there is not as much discrimination as in a designed experiment. A designed experiment attempts to determine causality, unlike an after the fact analysis like the correlation shown which can only find correlations. |
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: O1
a R Squared = .266 (Adjusted R Squared = .205) |
Experimental Design
Lets say you have a suspicion about Setting A and Setting B, so you design an experiment (a full factorial). In this case, you plan to have a low (represented by 1, a setting of 10 in the process) and high (2, a setting of 20 in the process) setting for both variables and run replicates of each possible setting in a random order. Here is what the data might look like:
|
What is the answer now? |